Citation Indices
|
All
|
Since 2016
|
Citation |
3079 |
2544 |
h-index |
21 |
19 |
i10-index |
93 |
77 |
Acceptance Rate (By Year)
|
|
Year
|
Percentage
|
2023
|
9.64%
|
2022
|
13.14%
|
2021
|
14.26%
|
2020
|
11.8%
|
2019
|
16.3%
|
2018
|
18.65%
|
2017
|
15.9%
|
2016
|
20.9%
|
2015
|
22.5%
|
Engineering Journal IJOER uses a careful review process to make sure all published research is of high quality. Every article submitted goes through a double-blind peer review, where both the author’s and reviewer’s identities are hidden. This ensures fair and unbiased reviews, helping maintain the journal’s standards and making sure only credible research is published.
The journal employs a double-blind peer review process, ensuring the anonymity of both the author and the reviewer. This process helps maintain fairness and objectivity, validating research and fostering credibility in the scientific community. Although peer review has its critics, it remains the most widely accepted method of ensuring the quality of published research.
Key features of the peer review process include:
IJOER is committed to maintaining high ethical standards in publishing. All submitted articles must adhere to the following guidelines:
Engineering Journal: IJOER strictly follows its peer review process and does not guarantee publication for any paper without following the established peer review protocols. Authors should be cautious of any individual or organization promising publication without adhering to these procedures, as this violates the journal's ethical standards and legal action may be taken against such parties.
If you have any questions or need further clarification, feel free to reach out to us at info.ijoer@gmail.com or info@ijoer.com. We look forward to receiving your valuable contributions to the field of engineering and science.