International Journal of
Engineering Research and Science
ISSN No. 2395-6992 | Impact Factor 6.81
Engineering Journal facebook page Engineering Journal twitter account Engineering Journal linkedin account Engineering Journal google scholar profile

Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage (CCUS): A Technical and Systems Review for Advanced Scholars

Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage (CCUS)

Summery: Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage (CCUS) is a critical pathway for deep decarbonization. This advanced review examines capture technologies, utilization routes, and storage mechanisms through a systems lens, addressing efficiency, scalability, techno-economic trade-offs, and integration challenges in energy and industrial infrastructures for climate mitigation.

Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage

Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage (CCUS): A Technical and Systems Review for Advanced Scholars

Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage (CCUS) has emerged as one of the most scientifically substantiated and technologically feasible methods for mitigating anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, stabilizing global temperatures cannot be achieved without the widespread deployment of CCUS systems globally. The concept encompasses three interlinked processes: the capture of CO₂ from industrial or atmospheric sources, its utilization as a chemical or industrial feedstock, and the permanent storage of captured CO₂ in geological formations. CCUS represents an indispensable component within a broader energy transition framework that must also include renewable energy expansion, electrification, hydrogen systems, and enhanced energy efficiency.

The science of CCUS is rooted in rigorous principles of thermodynamics, geologic engineering, catalysis, chemical reaction engineering, and materials science. Foundational texts such as Carbon Capture by Baciocchi and Carbon Dioxide Utilisation by Peter Styring detail the multidisciplinary nature of the field. These technical frameworks are advanced by contemporary research published in leading journals including International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, Energy & Environmental Science, and Applied Energy.

This blog provides a comprehensive examination of CCUS technologies, material innovations, industrial utilization pathways, geological storage science, and next-generation systems. The structure and depth are aligned with the expectations of Masters and doctoral scholarship, offering an analytical perspective for advanced scholars.

1. Scientific Foundations of CCUS

Thermodynamic Principles of Carbon Dioxide Separation

The separation of CO₂ from gas mixtures is governed by chemical potential gradients and phase behavior. The high stability of the CO₂ molecule presents thermodynamic challenges, particularly at low partial pressures. The minimum work required for separation varies fundamentally across sectors due to differing concentrations in industrial emissions. For high-concentration sources (e.g., ammonia plants), the separation energy is significantly lower than for diluted streams from cement kilns or atmospheric Direct Air Capture (DAC). Chemical engineering thermodynamics texts detail the minimum Gibbs free energy changes for CO₂ phase separation and solvent regeneration cycles, principles that direct modern solvent and sorbent design.

Kinetics of Absorption and Adsorption Systems

The rate of CO₂ capture is governed by mass transfer coefficients, chemical reaction rates, surface area availability, and diffusional constraints. Aqueous amine systems rely on rapid acid-base reactions, while solid sorbents utilize physisorption or chemisorption. Microporous materials like zeolites exhibit fast kinetics but suffer from stability issues in humid conditions. Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs) demonstrate high capacities but require enhanced structural robustness for industrial deployment. The kinetic behaviors of these systems are extensively covered in reaction engineering and adsorption science literature.

2. Industrial CO₂ Sources & Capture Challenges

High-Purity Streams

Certain industrial processes, such as ammonia production, hydrogen production via steam methane reforming, and natural gas sweetening, produce high-purity CO₂ streams requiring minimal conditioning. These sources represent the most economical entry points for CCUS deployment, as they avoid energy-intensive separation steps, though compression and transport costs remain substantial.

Dilute Streams: Power & Cement Sectors

Coal and natural gas power plants emit flue gas with CO₂ concentrations of 4–15%. Cement kilns produce CO₂ from both fuel combustion and limestone calcination. The presence of water vapor, SOₓ, NOₓ, and particulates in these dilute streams complicates capture, necessitating flue gas pretreatment, corrosion-resistant solvents, and high-temperature membrane materials.

Ultra-Dilute Streams: Direct Air Capture (DAC)

Atmospheric CO₂ concentration (~420 ppm) presents a formidable thermodynamic challenge. DAC systems employ highly reactive sorbents and massive air-contact systems. While essential for addressing legacy emissions and achieving net-negative emissions, DAC faces high capital and energy costs, driving research into advanced sorbent materials and renewable energy integration.

3. Carbon Capture Technologies: A Comparative Overview

Technology Mechanism Best For Key Challenges
Solvent-Based (Amines) Chemical Absorption Post-combustion (Power Plants) High regeneration energy, solvent degradation, corrosion
Advanced Solvents (Biphasic) Phase-Change Absorption Dilute streams with waste heat Viscosity control, scalability, environmental impact
Adsorption (Zeolites, MOFs) Physisorption/Chemisorption Industrial off-gas, DAC Moisture sensitivity, stability, sorbent cost
Membranes (Polymer/Ceramic) Selective Permeation High-pressure streams, pre-combustion Permeability-selectivity trade-off, durability
Cryogenic Distillation Low-Temperature Liquefaction High-purity, high-pressure streams Very high energy intensity, complex operation
Calcium Looping Reversible Carbonation Cement plants, power generation Sorbent sintering, reactor design complexity
Chemical Looping Combustion Oxygen Carrier Redox Power generation with inherent separation Oxygen carrier durability, system complexity

Solvent-Based Capture

Conventional aqueous amines like monoethanolamine (MEA) offer high reaction kinetics but suffer from high regeneration energy, thermal degradation, and corrosion. Advancements include blended amine systems and phase-change solvents (e.g., biphasic amines) that separate into CO₂-rich and lean phases, significantly reducing regeneration heat duty.

Engineering Journal IJOER Call for Papers

Adsorption-Based Systems

Zeolites and activated carbons are well-studied but struggle with performance in humid flue gas. Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs) offer tunable pore structures and high surface areas, but require improved hydrothermal stability and reduced synthesis costs for industrial application. Novel hybrid sorbents, combining inorganic supports with amine functional groups, show promise for temperature-swing adsorption processes utilizing low-grade waste heat.

Membrane Technologies

Separation performance hinges on the permeability-selectivity trade-off. Polymer membranes are cost-effective but lack stability in harsh conditions. Ceramic and metal-organic membranes offer superior stability at higher cost. Mixed-matrix membranes and facilitated transport membranes incorporating fixed carriers are active research frontiers aimed at enhancing flux and selectivity.

Novel Systems

  • Cryogenic Capture: Energy-intensive but suitable for high-pressure streams; advancements focus on heat exchanger design.
  • Calcium Looping: Uses the reversible reaction between CaO and CO₂; integrates well with cement production.
  • Chemical Looping Combustion: Uses metal oxide oxygen carriers to produce a pure CO₂ stream; challenges include material sintering.

4. Carbon Dioxide Utilization Pathways

Utilization creates economic value and supports a circular carbon economy, though it cannot sequester all captured CO₂.

  • Chemical Manufacturing: CO₂ hydrogenation to methanol (using Cu/ZnO catalysts), formic acid (using Pd/Ru catalysts), or urea. These pathways require efficient catalysts and renewable hydrogen.
  • Mineral Carbonation: Reacting CO₂ with alkaline earth metal oxides (e.g., in silicate minerals like olivine) to form stable carbonates for use in construction materials (e.g., carbonated concrete).
  • Biotechnological Routes: Using microalgae/cyanobacteria to fix CO₂ via photosynthesis, producing biomass for biofuels, nutraceuticals, or bioplastics.
  • Synthetic Fuels: Combining captured CO₂ with green hydrogen to produce syngas, which can be converted to hydrocarbons via Fischer-Tropsch synthesis, creating "drop-in" fuels for existing infrastructure.

5. Geological Storage: Principles and Security

Geological storage involves injecting supercritical CO₂ into deep subsurface formations:

  • Depleted Oil & Gas Reservoirs: Well-understood geology and existing infrastructure offer early opportunities, often coupled with Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR).
  • Deep Saline Aquifers: Offer the largest global storage capacity but require extensive characterization.
  • Basalt Formations: Reactive silicate minerals promote rapid mineral trapping into solid carbonates, enhancing permanence.

Trapping Mechanisms evolve over time: initial structural & stratigraphic trapping under impermeable caprocks, followed by residual trapping in pore spaces, solubility trapping as CO₂ dissolves in brine, and ultimately mineral trapping as carbonate minerals.

6. The Critical Frontier: CCUS Integration in Hard-to-Abate Industries

Power Generation

Post-combustion capture integrated with coal/natural gas plants imposes a significant energy penalty (20-30% of plant output) for solvent regeneration. Process integration research focuses on optimizing low-pressure steam extraction to minimize this penalty. Oxy-fuel combustion and pre-combustion capture in IGCC plants offer alternatives with different integration complexities.

Cement Industry

The major challenge is process emissions from limestone calcination (∼50% of total). Integration strategies include:

  • Post-combustion capture of kiln exhaust.
  • Oxy-fuel combustion in the kiln.
  • Calcium Looping Integration: The spent sorbent (CaCO₃) can be fed directly into the kiln to produce clinker, creating a synergistic material loop.

Steel Sector

Emissions arise from coke combustion and iron ore reduction. Key integration pathways:

  • Blast Furnace with Top Gas Recycling: CO₂ is removed from the furnace gas, and the CO-rich stream is recycled, reducing coke consumption.
  • Direct Reduced Iron (DRI) with NG/H₂: Produces a more concentrated CO₂ stream suitable for capture. Hydrogen-based DRI eliminates process emissions but requires large-scale, low-carbon H₂.

Hydrogen & Ammonia Production

Steam Methane Reforming (SMR) inherently produces a high-purity CO₂ stream after the water-gas shift reaction, making blue hydrogen production one of the most straightforward and cost-effective CCUS applications. Captured CO₂ can also be used on-site to produce urea.

Industrial Clusters & Hubs

Co-locating multiple emission sources (power plants, refineries, steel, cement) enables shared CO₂ transport and storage infrastructure, achieving economies of scale and dramatically improving project economics through risk and cost-sharing.

7. PhD Research Scope: Interdisciplinary Frontiers for Original Contribution

The complexity of CCUS presents rich opportunities for doctoral research that bridges fundamental science, engineering innovation, and systems analysis.

1. Next-Generation Materials & Chemistry

  • Project: Design and synthesize novel metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) or covalent organic frameworks (COFs) with targeted functional groups for selective CO₂ capture from ultra-dilute (DAC) or humid flue gas streams.
  • Question: Can we use machine learning-driven high-throughput screening to discover sorbent materials with an optimal balance of capacity, selectivity, kinetics, and hydrothermal stability?
  • Methodology: Computational chemistry (DFT, molecular dynamics), organic synthesis, characterization (BET, XRD, FTIR), and dynamic adsorption testing.

2. Process Intensification & Novel Capture Concepts

  • Project: Develop and model a hybrid capture process (e.g., membrane-assisted solvent absorption, adsorption-absorption cascades) to significantly reduce the energy penalty for post-combustion capture.
  • Question: What is the optimal degree of process integration and heat recovery between a capture unit and a host industrial plant (e.g., cement kiln) to minimize total levelized cost?
  • Methodology: Aspen Plus/ HYSYS process simulation, techno-economic analysis (TEA), pinch analysis, and pilot-scale validation.

3. Utilization Catalysis & Reactor Engineering

  • Project: Engineer multifunctional heterogeneous catalysts for the direct electrochemical or thermocatalytic conversion of CO₂ to high-value C2+ products (e.g., ethylene, ethanol) with high selectivity and stability.
  • Question: How can we design reactor systems (e.g., electrochemical, trickle bed, membrane reactors) to overcome mass transfer limitations in CO₂ hydrogenation or carbonate synthesis reactions?
  • Methodology: Catalyst synthesis & testing, in-situ spectroscopy, reactor modeling (CFD), and life cycle assessment of the product value chain.

4. Geoscience & Secure Storage

  • Project: Conduct advanced coupled hydro-geo-mechanical-chemical modeling to predict long-term CO₂ plume migration, trapping mechanisms, and potential caprock integrity issues in complex saline aquifers.
  • Question: Can novel geophysical monitoring techniques (e.g., distributed acoustic sensing, time-lapse seismic) be optimized for early leakage detection and cost-effective Measurement, Monitoring, and Verification (MMV)?
  • Methodology: Reservoir simulation (CMG, TOUGH2), core-flood experiments, geochemical modeling, and field data analysis from demonstration sites.

5. Systems Integration & Socio-Technical Transitions

  • Project: Model the development of a regional CCUS cluster, optimizing pipeline networks, storage site development, and economic incentives to enable decarbonization of multiple industrial emitters.
  • Question: What mix of policy instruments (carbon pricing, tax credits, contracts for difference) and business models is most effective for de-risking early-stage CCUS projects and attracting private investment?
  • Methodology: Geospatial optimization, energy systems modeling (MARKAL/TIMES), policy analysis, and stakeholder engagement workshops.

Methodological Imperative: High-impact PhD research in CCUS will bridge scales—connecting molecular-level interactions to process-level optimization, and further to system-level deployment and policy. It requires an interdisciplinary mindset, combining experimental work with modeling and a clear view of the ultimate application. For those pursuing such research, resources on research proposal writing and statement of purpose preparation can be invaluable.

CCUS is a mandatory component of global climate mitigation efforts, particularly for decarbonizing hard-to-abate industrial sectors. From solvent chemistry to geochemical storage science, it is founded on decades of research in chemical engineering, materials science, geology, and environmental science. The path forward requires continued innovation to reduce energy penalties, improve material durability, and enhance economic feasibility through smart integration and policy support. For advanced scholars, this field offers a dynamic and impactful research landscape where scientific rigor directly contributes to solving one of society's most pressing challenges.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What is the core value proposition of CCUS?

Ans. : CCUS enables the continued operation of essential, carbon-intensive industries (cement, steel, chemical production) during the energy transition by capturing their emissions. It also provides a pathway for negative emissions when combined with bioenergy (BECCS) or Direct Air Capture, which is crucial for offsetting residual emissions and meeting net-zero targets.

2. Post-combustion vs. Pre-combustion vs. Oxy-fuel: Which is best?

Ans. : There is no single best technology; the choice depends on the source.

  • Post-combustion is a retrofit solution for existing power and industrial plants.
  • Pre-combustion is more efficient but requires integrated gasification, making it suitable for new-build plants (e.g., IGCC) or hydrogen production.
  • Oxy-fuel produces a pure CO₂ stream but has high energy costs for air separation. The "best" technology minimizes total cost and integration complexity for a specific application.

3. Why is CCUS considered critical for cement and steel?

Ans. : These sectors have process emissions inherent to their chemistry (calcining limestone, reducing iron ore). These emissions are unavoidable regardless of how clean the fuel is. CCUS is the only known technology that can address these non-combustion CO₂ sources at scale.

4. Does Utilization solve the climate problem?

Ans. : Not alone. Most utilization pathways (e.g., fuels, chemicals) eventually re-release CO₂. Their value is in creating markets for captured carbon, improving early-stage economics, displacing fossil feedstocks, and in some cases (like mineralization) providing permanent storage. Utilization must be paired with permanent geological storage for net emissions reduction.

5. How safe is long-term geological storage?

Ans. : Multiple natural analogs (e.g., natural CO₂ fields that have been trapped for millions of years) and decades of industrial experience (e.g., EOR, Sleipner project) indicate it is safe with proper site selection, monitoring, and regulation. Regulatory frameworks are evolving to address long-term liability and ensure rigorous site characterization, monitoring, and verification protocols.

6. What are the biggest barriers to large-scale deployment?

Ans. : Economics is the primary barrier: high capital and operating costs, especially for capture. Policy uncertainty around carbon pricing and lack of clear business models for transport/storage networks also hinder investment. Technical challenges like energy penalty and integration complexity remain active R&D areas.

7. How does CCUS interact with renewable energy?

Ans. : They are complementary. CCUS can provide dispatchable low-carbon power to balance grid intermittency from renewables. Furthermore, renewable electricity is needed to produce green hydrogen, which is a key feedstock for CO₂ utilization (e.g., synthetic fuels) and for decarbonizing industries like steel, which in turn can be coupled with CCUS.

8. What is an "Industrial CCUS Cluster"?

Ans. : A cluster is a geographic area where multiple industrial emitters share common CO₂ transport and storage infrastructure. This reduces individual risk and cost by creating economies of scale. Examples include the "Net Zero Teesside" (UK) and "Porthos" (Netherlands) projects, which aim to decarbonize multiple factories and power plants via a shared offshore storage site.

9. What policy tools drive CCUS investment?

Ans. : Effective tools include: a robust carbon price (tax or trading system), investment tax credits (like the US 45Q), contracts for difference for carbon removal, grant funding for pilot/demo projects, and clear regulatory frameworks for pore space ownership and long-term storage liability.

10. What are the most urgent research needs?

Ans. :

  • Materials: Low-cost, durable sorbents and membranes with high performance in real flue gas.
  • Process: Intensified, low-energy capture processes.
  • Integration: Dynamic optimization of CCUS within flexible energy systems.
  • Storage: Improved monitoring and faster mineralization techniques.
  • Policy: Effective business and governance models for shared infrastructure.

Recommended Further Reading

Explore more resources on Industry 4.0 and advanced engineering technologies:

Contact Engineering Journal: IJOER:

Impact Factor: 6.81engineering journal Impact factor ijoer blog right side bard advertisementOctober 2025 Articlesengineering journal new icon
Citation Indices
All
Since 2020
Citation
2359
1680
h-index
19
15
i10-index
57
24
Track Your Article Journal Indexing FAQs Blog Fields of Interest Journal policies Process of Publication
Acceptance Rate (By Year)
Year
Percentage
2023
9.64%
2027
17.64%
2022
13.14%
2021
14.26%
2020
11.8%
2019
16.3%
2018
18.65%
2017
15.9%
2016
20.9%
2015
22.5%