Valorization of Waste Polyethylene Terephthalate as a Partial Fine Aggregate Replacement in Concrete: An Experimental Assessment of Fresh and Hardened Properties

Authors: Tolulope Adelola Akintunde; Adebola Saheed Akolade; Oluwatunmise Peter Abolarin; Praise Adenike Alli; Tolulope Oyewumi Ajao; Joseph Dare Adekunle
Valorization of Waste Polyethylene Terephthalate as a Partial Fine Aggregate Replacement in Concrete: An Experimental Assessment of Fresh and Hardened Properties
DIN
IJOER-SEP-2026-1
Abstract

The escalating accumulation of plastic waste, particularly Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET), poses a significant environmental challenge, especially in developing regions with inadequate waste management systems. This study investigated the valorization of Waste Polyethylene Terephthalate (WPET) as a partial substitute for fine aggregate in concrete production, with a view to addressing both plastic waste disposal and the depletion of natural aggregate resources. WPET sourced from industrial plastic waste was collected, mechanically crushed, washed, and characterized through sieve analysis and specific gravity determination to assess its suitability as a lightweight aggregate prior to incorporation into concrete mixes. Concrete cubes were cast at a 1:2:4 mix ratio, with WPET substituting fine aggregate at 1%, 2%, 4%, 6%, and 8% by weight, using both washed gravel and crushed granite as coarse aggregates. Slump, density, and compressive strength tests were conducted at curing ages of 7, 14, 21, and 28 days to evaluate the fresh and hardened properties of the resulting concrete, with results benchmarked against relevant British Standard specifications. Findings revealed a progressive decline in workability, density, and compressive strength with increasing WPET content, attributable to the hydrophobic nature of plastic particles and their effect on bonding within the cement matrix. Nonetheless, specimens with lower replacement levels (up to 4%) met acceptable thresholds for lightweight and non-structural applications. The study concludes that WPET can serve as a viable partial fine aggregate substitute within optimized replacement limits, offering a practical pathway for plastic waste valorization, reduction of environmental pollution, conservation of natural aggregates, and promotion of sustainable construction practices.

Keywords
Plastic waste valorization WPET fine aggregate substitution lightweight concrete compressive strength
Introduction

Plastics have become integral to modern life, owing to their durability, affordability, versatility, light weight, and ease of manufacture. They find application across a wide range of sectors, including packaging, transportation, healthcare, construction, electronics, agriculture, water supply systems, and household goods. The steady rise in urbanization, industrial activity, and consumer demand has driven a corresponding surge in global plastic production and consumption. Yet the persistence of most plastics in the environment has created a pressing ecological problem, a challenge that is especially acute in developing countries where waste management infrastructure remains weak. Polyethylene terephthalate (PET), widely used for beverage and water bottles, makes up a substantial share of municipal solid waste and ranks among the most conspicuous forms of plastic pollution in both urban and rural settings (Qaidi et al., 2023; Mostafaei et al., 2026). Worldwide, plastic waste is generated at a scale of millions of tonnes annually, with PET accounting for a sizeable proportion owing to its dominance in the packaging sector. Poor disposal practices, ranging from open dumping and burning to indiscriminate littering, have given rise to a host of environmental problems, including drainage blockages, soil contamination, flooding, visual blight, and harm to aquatic life. In Nigeria and other developing countries, discarded PET bottles are a familiar sight along roadsides, in drains, around markets, on construction sites, and in public spaces. Given that PET can take centuries to break down, its continued accumulation represents a long-term environmental hazard (Uche et al., 2026; Oke et al., 2025). These concerns have prompted researchers and environmental agencies to step up efforts toward sustainable waste management strategies centred on recycling, reuse, and resource recovery. Among the most promising avenues is the incorporation of waste materials into construction products, particularly concrete. As the most extensively used construction material in the world, concrete owes its popularity to its versatility, strength, durability, and comparatively low cost. However, the ongoing extraction of natural aggregates such as sand and gravel for concrete production has taken a toll on the environment, depleting natural resources and disrupting ecosystems. This has fuelled growing interest in alternative, sustainable materials that can partially replace conventional concrete constituents without substantially compromising structural integrity (Qaidi et al., 2023; Reana et al., 2026). Against this backdrop, the use of waste PET as a partial fine aggregate replacement in concrete has emerged as an attractive solution that simultaneously addresses plastic pollution and resource conservation. A growing body of research has shown that incorporating PET particles into concrete mixes affects key engineering properties, including compressive strength, tensile strength, density, workability, thermal insulation, shrinkage, and durability. PET-modified concrete also tends to be lighter, making it a candidate for non-structural and lightweight construction uses. Beyond its technical merits, recycling PET into concrete reduces pressure on landfills and supports circular economy principles within the construction sector (Mostafaei et al., 2026; Uche et al., 2026). More recent studies have reinforced this picture, showing that controlled replacement levels of fine aggregate with PET can yield compressive strengths suitable for specific applications. The general trend reported is that lower PET replacement percentages tend to preserve mechanical performance better, whereas higher proportions can weaken the bond between cement paste and aggregate due to the hydrophobic nature of plastic. Even so, several researchers maintain that PET concrete holds considerable promise for sustainable construction provided the replacement ratio is carefully optimized (Qaidi et al., 2023; Xiao et al., 2026). This expanding interest has, in turn, spurred further investigation into how PET-based concrete performs under varying mix proportions and curing regimes. In the Nigerian context, where plastic waste management remains a persistent challenge, repurposing waste PET bottles into construction materials offers a potentially valuable dual benefit: environmental relief and economic gain. Such an approach could ease pollution, conserve natural fine aggregate resources, cut material costs, and support more sustainable infrastructure development. It is against this backdrop that evaluating the engineering performance of PET-incorporated concrete, with particular attention to compressive strength, becomes an important step toward establishing its practical suitability for construction. This study, accordingly, investigated the effects of waste PET on the compressive strength of lightweight concrete when used as a partial fine aggregate replacement. Specifically, the research compared the compressive strength behaviour of concrete produced with two different coarse aggregates, namely washed gravel and crushed granite, while varying the proportion of PET waste substituted for sand. The study further examined how different PET replacement levels influenced strength development at curing ages of 7, 14, 21, and 28 days, with a view to identifying the optimum replacement level capable of delivering satisfactory compressive strength. In addition, the suitability of the resulting PET-modified concrete for construction use was assessed by benchmarking the results against relevant British Standard specifications for concrete. The impetus for this research stems from the mounting accumulation of PET bottle waste in the environment and the corresponding need for sustainable approaches to its disposal. The non-biodegradable nature and long environmental lifespan of PET waste have made it a significant ecological concern, while the construction industry continues to face mounting demand for conventional materials such as sand and gravel. Integrating waste PET into concrete production therefore offers a means of tackling environmental pollution while conserving natural resources and lowering construction costs. In this way, the study contributes to ongoing efforts to develop construction materials that are both environmentally sustainable and economically viable through innovative recycling approaches. The scope of the study was confined to the use of PET waste as a partial fine aggregate replacement in concrete prepared at a 1:2:4 mix ratio, using two types of coarse aggregate, washed gravel and granite. The experimental work comprised slump testing, specific gravity determination, and compressive strength testing, with PET replacement levels varied up to a maximum of 8%. The results obtained were assessed in line with the relevant British Standard specifications.

Engineering Journal IJOER Call for Papers

Conclusion

This study evaluated the use of waste polyethylene terephthalate (WPET) as a partial replacement for fine aggregate in concrete containing washed gravel and crushed granite. The WPET material had a lower specific gravity than river sharp sand, confirming its potential to reduce the mass of concrete when incorporated under suitable mix conditions. However, the density results varied with replacement level, curing age, and coarse aggregate type and did not show a uniform reduction at every WPET content. The slump results indicated that WPET incorporation generally reduced workability, although the response was not perfectly linear. The compressive-strength results showed that the optimum replacement level depended on the coarse aggregate used. The highest 28-day strength for the washed-gravel concrete was 10.2 N/mm² at 2% WPET, while the highest value for the granite concrete was 13.2 N/mm² at 1% WPET. Higher replacement levels did not consistently improve strength and, in some mixtures, resulted in substantial strength reduction. The findings indicate that WPET may be used as a controlled partial replacement for fine aggregate in selected lightweight or non-structural concrete applications. However, the results do not establish that WPET concrete is suitable for all structural applications. Further investigations involving durability, water absorption, fire performance, long-term behaviour, leaching, life-cycle assessment, and detailed cost–benefit analysis are required before large-scale application. The study demonstrates the technical potential of recovering WPET for concrete production, but the economic feasibility of the process will depend on the cost of collection, transportation, cleaning, crushing, drying, and sieving relative to the cost of the natural sand replaced.

References
  1. Alexander, M., Mindess, S., & Otieno, M. (2025). Aggregates in concrete (2nd ed.). CRC Press.
  2. American Society for Testing and Materials. (2018). ASTM C33/C33M-18: Standard specification for concrete aggregates. ASTM International. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0033_C0033M-18
  3. American Society for Testing and Materials. (2020). ASTM C143/C143M-20: Standard test method for slump of hydraulic-cement concrete. ASTM International. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0143_C0143M-20
  4. American Society for Testing and Materials. (2021). ASTM C128-15(2021): Standard test method for relative density (specific gravity) and absorption of fine aggregate. ASTM International. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0128-15
  5. American Society for Testing and Materials. (2019). ASTM C136/C136M-19: Standard test method for sieve analysis of fine and coarse aggregates. ASTM International. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0136_C0136M-19
  6. British Standards Institution. (1997). BS 8110-1:1997: Structural use of concrete—Part 1: Code of practice for design and construction. BSI Standards Publication.
  7. British Standards Institution. (1985). BS 812-103.1: Testing aggregates—Part 103: Methods for determination of particle size distribution—Sieve tests. BSI Standards Publication.
  8. British Standards Institution. (2000). BS EN 206-1:2000: Concrete—Part 1: Specification, performance, production and conformity. BSI Standards Publication.
  9. British Standards Institution. (2018). BS EN 197-1: Cement—Part 1: Composition, specifications and conformity criteria for common cements. BSI Standards Publication.
  10. British Standards Institution. (2019a). BS EN 12390-2: Testing hardened concrete—Part 2: Making and curing specimens for strength tests. BSI Standards Publication.
  11. British Standards Institution. (2019b). BS EN 12390-3: Testing hardened concrete—Part 3: Compressive strength of test specimens. BSI Standards Publication.
  12. British Standards Institution. (2012). BS EN 933-1: Tests for geometrical properties of aggregates—Part 1: Determination of particle size distribution—Sieving method. BSI Standards Publication.
  13. British Standards Institution. (2017). BS EN 206: Concrete—Specification, performance, production and conformity. BSI Standards Publication.
  14. British Standards Institution. (2021). BS EN 12390-1: Testing hardened concrete—Part 1: Shape, dimensions and other requirements for specimens and moulds. BSI Standards Publication.
  15. Babafemi, A. J., Šavija, B., Paul, S. C., & Anggraini, V. (2018). Engineering properties of concrete with waste recycled plastic: A review. Sustainability, *10*(11), Article 3875. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10113875
  16. Gu, L., & Ozbakkaloglu, T. (2019). Use of recycled plastics in concrete: A critical review. Waste Management, *51*, 19-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.03.005
  17. Kamal, M. A., Moussa, R. R., & Guirguis, M. N. (2021). Recycled plastic as an aggregate in concrete. Civil Engineering and Architecture, *9*(5), 1289-1294. https://doi.org/10.13189/cea.2021.090502
  18. Oke, A., Ojo, O. M., Olabanji, T. O., Akinmusere, O. K., & Akande, S. P. (2025). Mechanical properties of laundry wastewater concrete incorporating polyethylene terephthalate (PET) as partial replacement for sand. Nigerian Journal of Technology, *43*(4), 618-627. https://doi.org/10.4314/njt.v43i4.2
  19. Mostafaei, H., Bahmani, H., & Wu, C. (2026). Sustainable high-performance concrete with rubber and PET waste: Mechanical, dynamic, microstructural, and life cycle cost analysis. International Journal of Pavement Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2026.2624578
  20. Qaidi, S., Al-Kamaki, Y. S. S., Hakeem, I. Y., Dulaimi, A. F., Özkılıç, Y. O., Sabri, M. M. S., & Sergeev, V. (2023). Investigation of the physical-mechanical properties and durability of high-strength concrete with recycled PET as a partial replacement for fine aggregates. Frontiers in Materials, *10*, Article 1101146. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2023.1101146
  21. Reana, I. J., Oti, J., & Adeleke, B. (2026). Strength and workability characteristics of concrete using recycled plastic waste for sustainable construction. Sustainability, *18*(4), Article 1831. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18041831
  22. Uche, C. K. A., Abubakar, S. A., Nnamchi, S. N., & Ukagwu, K. J. (2023). Polyethylene terephthalate aggregates in structural lightweight concrete: A meta-analysis and review. Discover Materials, *3*, Article 24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43939-023-00060-8
  23. Uche, C. K. A., Abubakar, S. A., Lawan, M. M., et al. (2026). Model and optimum mix designs for sustainable structural lightweight concrete with aggregates from PET plastic waste. Discover Applied Sciences, *8*, Article 403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-026-08471-x
  24. Xiao, J., Yu, C., Wang, B., et al. (2026). Recycled aggregate concrete design, application and challenges. Nature Reviews Clean Technology, *2*, 67-83. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44359-025-00125-2
  25. Zulkernain, N. H., Gani, P., Ng, C. C., & Uvarajan, T. (2021). Utilisation of plastic waste as aggregate in construction materials: A review. Construction and Building Materials, *296*, Article 123669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123669.
Article Preview